Add traceability matrix TM-001 and review records RC-004 to RC-007

2026-10-10 08:03:30 +08:00
parent f01d0f7caa
commit aa3f08876d
6 changed files with 248 additions and 1 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+# Review Record: SA-001 Stakeholder Analysis
+
+## Metadata
+| Key | Value |
+| --- | --- |
+| ID | RC-004 |
+| CrossReference | [SA-001], [QC-SA-001] |
+
+## Version History
+| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
+| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
+| 2026-10-10 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S05 | Initial version | pending |
+
+---
+
+## Artifact Under Review
+
+- Instance reviewed: [SA-001]
+- Checklist used: [QC-SA-001]
+
+## Checklist Results
+
+| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
+| --- | --- | --- | --- |
+| 1 | Power/Interest grid is filled for every stakeholder, with no gaps or unclassified entries | Pass | S01 to S05 each have Power, Interest and Quadrant. |
+| 2 | Each stakeholder is assigned a unique, stable ID reusable for RACI assignments in other artifacts | Pass | IDs S01 to S05 are used by BC-001, PP-001 and the milestones. |
+| 3 | Roles and organizational context are defined with explicit Power and Interest levels, not just narrative description | Pass | Role, organization and HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW levels per stakeholder, with a rationale section. |
+| 4 | Communication needs (channel, frequency, deliverable type) are mapped to project phases or milestones | Pass | Communication Requirements table maps each stakeholder to a milestone. |
+| 5 | Conflicting stakeholder interests are identified with documented mitigation or resolution strategies | Pass | Four conflicts, each with stakeholders and a mitigation. |
+| 6 | Stakeholder concerns are explicitly traced to Business Case objectives | Pass | Business Goal Alignment maps each concern to O1 to O4 of BC-001. |
+| 7 | Primary concerns are expressed in both business language and a recognized quality-attribute mapping (e.g. FURPS+) | Pass | Primary Concern column plus a FURPS+ mapping table. |
+| 8 | Document is understandable and navigable by non-technical stakeholders reviewing their own entry | Pass | Plain-language summary table and one section per topic. |
+
+## Overall Verdict
+
+Go — all eight criteria pass, with two follow-ups that do not affect the criteria. Retrospective review prepared 2026-10-10 at the request of S01; the instance has been `Accepted` since 2026-10-03 and this record confirms it against the checklist. The author and the approving reviewer are the same person (S01); independent review by S05 is recorded in RC-001 and applies here too.
+
+## Action Items
+
+| Action | Owner | Due |
+| --- | --- | --- |
+| Update the Sign-Off section, which still says 'Pending review by S01 and S05', with a Version History row | S01 | 2026-10-17 |
+| Identify the holders of the S03 role (listed as 'holders to be confirmed') | S01 | 2026-10-17 |
+
+---
+
+[SA-001]: ../../stakeholder-analysis.md
+[QC-SA-001]: ../../../framework/qc/qc-stakeholder-analysis.md