Add traceability matrix TM-001 and review records RC-004 to RC-007

This commit is contained in:
2026-10-10 08:03:30 +08:00
parent f01d0f7caa
commit aa3f08876d
6 changed files with 248 additions and 1 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
# Review Record: SA-001 Stakeholder Analysis
## Metadata
| Key | Value |
| --- | --- |
| ID | RC-004 |
| CrossReference | [SA-001], [QC-SA-001] |
## Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2026-10-10 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S05 | Initial version | pending |
---
## Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: [SA-001]
- Checklist used: [QC-SA-001]
## Checklist Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Power/Interest grid is filled for every stakeholder, with no gaps or unclassified entries | Pass | S01 to S05 each have Power, Interest and Quadrant. |
| 2 | Each stakeholder is assigned a unique, stable ID reusable for RACI assignments in other artifacts | Pass | IDs S01 to S05 are used by BC-001, PP-001 and the milestones. |
| 3 | Roles and organizational context are defined with explicit Power and Interest levels, not just narrative description | Pass | Role, organization and HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW levels per stakeholder, with a rationale section. |
| 4 | Communication needs (channel, frequency, deliverable type) are mapped to project phases or milestones | Pass | Communication Requirements table maps each stakeholder to a milestone. |
| 5 | Conflicting stakeholder interests are identified with documented mitigation or resolution strategies | Pass | Four conflicts, each with stakeholders and a mitigation. |
| 6 | Stakeholder concerns are explicitly traced to Business Case objectives | Pass | Business Goal Alignment maps each concern to O1 to O4 of BC-001. |
| 7 | Primary concerns are expressed in both business language and a recognized quality-attribute mapping (e.g. FURPS+) | Pass | Primary Concern column plus a FURPS+ mapping table. |
| 8 | Document is understandable and navigable by non-technical stakeholders reviewing their own entry | Pass | Plain-language summary table and one section per topic. |
## Overall Verdict
Go — all eight criteria pass, with two follow-ups that do not affect the criteria. Retrospective review prepared 2026-10-10 at the request of S01; the instance has been `Accepted` since 2026-10-03 and this record confirms it against the checklist. The author and the approving reviewer are the same person (S01); independent review by S05 is recorded in RC-001 and applies here too.
## Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Update the Sign-Off section, which still says 'Pending review by S01 and S05', with a Version History row | S01 | 2026-10-17 |
| Identify the holders of the S03 role (listed as 'holders to be confirmed') | S01 | 2026-10-17 |
---
[SA-001]: ../../stakeholder-analysis.md
[QC-SA-001]: ../../../framework/qc/qc-stakeholder-analysis.md
+45
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
# Review Record: MIL-002
## Metadata
| Key | Value |
| --- | --- |
| ID | RC-005 |
| CrossReference | [MIL-002], [QC-MIL-001] |
## Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2026-10-10 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S05 | Initial version | pending |
---
## Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: [MIL-002]
- Checklist used: [QC-MIL-001]
## Checklist Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | A concrete deliverable is defined for every gate | Pass | Deliverable: verified onboarding and operations guide, credential validation step and categorized failure messages. |
| 2 | Explicit Go/No-Go criteria are stated for each gate | Pass | Five criteria, each with an objectively checkable Go and No-Go column. |
| 3 | Dependencies on other milestones are explicitly mapped | Pass | Dependencies: depends on MIL-001, with the reason stated. |
| 4 | Each milestone is traceable to a Business Case objective or KPI | Pass | Traceability maps MIL-002 to O2 and O3 of BC-001. |
| 5 | Milestone owner and approving reviewer are identified | Pass | Owner S05 and approving reviewer S01. |
| 6 | Milestone has a defined target date consistent with project constraints | Pass | Target date 2026-10-31, marked proposed; the Business Case sets no deadline, so nothing contradicts it. |
## Overall Verdict
Go — all six criteria pass. Retrospective review prepared 2026-10-10 at the request of S01; the instance has been `Accepted` since 2026-10-03 and this record confirms it against the checklist. The author and the approving reviewer are the same person (S01); independent review by S05 is recorded in RC-001 and applies here too.
## Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Confirm the proposed target date with S01 and S05 (the date is still marked proposed) | S05 | 2026-10-17 |
---
[MIL-002]: ../../milestones/mil-002-onboarding-and-operations.md
[QC-MIL-001]: ../../../framework/qc/qc-milestones-gateways.md
+45
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
# Review Record: MIL-003
## Metadata
| Key | Value |
| --- | --- |
| ID | RC-006 |
| CrossReference | [MIL-003], [QC-MIL-001] |
## Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2026-10-10 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S05 | Initial version | pending |
---
## Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: [MIL-003]
- Checklist used: [QC-MIL-001]
## Checklist Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | A concrete deliverable is defined for every gate | Pass | Deliverable: a reusable quality-check workflow used by one other repository, and a results guide. |
| 2 | Explicit Go/No-Go criteria are stated for each gate | Pass | Four criteria, each with an objectively checkable Go and No-Go column. |
| 3 | Dependencies on other milestones are explicitly mapped | Pass | Dependencies: depends on MIL-002, with the reason stated. |
| 4 | Each milestone is traceable to a Business Case objective or KPI | Pass | Traceability maps MIL-003 to O4 of BC-001. |
| 5 | Milestone owner and approving reviewer are identified | Pass | Owner S05 and approving reviewer S01. |
| 6 | Milestone has a defined target date consistent with project constraints | Pass | Target date 2026-11-14, marked proposed; the Business Case sets no deadline, so nothing contradicts it. |
## Overall Verdict
Go — all six criteria pass. Retrospective review prepared 2026-10-10 at the request of S01; the instance has been `Accepted` since 2026-10-03 and this record confirms it against the checklist. The author and the approving reviewer are the same person (S01); independent review by S05 is recorded in RC-001 and applies here too.
## Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Confirm the proposed target date with S01 and S05 (the date is still marked proposed) | S05 | 2026-10-17 |
---
[MIL-003]: ../../milestones/mil-003-quality-checks.md
[QC-MIL-001]: ../../../framework/qc/qc-milestones-gateways.md
+45
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
# Review Record: MIL-004
## Metadata
| Key | Value |
| --- | --- |
| ID | RC-007 |
| CrossReference | [MIL-004], [QC-MIL-001] |
## Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2026-10-10 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S05 | Initial version | pending |
---
## Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: [MIL-004]
- Checklist used: [QC-MIL-001]
## Checklist Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | A concrete deliverable is defined for every gate | Pass | Deliverable: documented release process, consumer upgrade guide and a reusable release workflow. |
| 2 | Explicit Go/No-Go criteria are stated for each gate | Pass | Four criteria, each with an objectively checkable Go and No-Go column. |
| 3 | Dependencies on other milestones are explicitly mapped | Pass | Dependencies: depends on MIL-003, with the reason stated. |
| 4 | Each milestone is traceable to a Business Case objective or KPI | Pass | Traceability maps MIL-004 to O4 of BC-001. |
| 5 | Milestone owner and approving reviewer are identified | Pass | Owner S05 and approving reviewer S01. |
| 6 | Milestone has a defined target date consistent with project constraints | Pass | Target date 2026-11-28, marked proposed; the Business Case sets no deadline, so nothing contradicts it. |
## Overall Verdict
Go — all six criteria pass. Retrospective review prepared 2026-10-10 at the request of S01; the instance has been `Accepted` since 2026-10-03 and this record confirms it against the checklist. The author and the approving reviewer are the same person (S01); independent review by S05 is recorded in RC-001 and applies here too.
## Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Confirm the proposed target date with S01 and S05 (the date is still marked proposed) | S05 | 2026-10-17 |
---
[MIL-004]: ../../milestones/mil-004-versioned-release.md
[QC-MIL-001]: ../../../framework/qc/qc-milestones-gateways.md