Write and accept the brief use cases for the P1 candidates
Add the use case diagram UCD-001, the user stories US-001 and the brief use cases UC-001 to UC-004 (Synchronize Repository Metadata, Configure Workflow Credentials, Onboard a Repository, Diagnose a Failed Workflow). Review and accept them (RC-019 to RC-024) and the PP-001 row that records them (RC-025), and update TM-001 and the registry. Task: MIL-002#1
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
|
||||
# Review Record: UCD-001
|
||||
|
||||
## Metadata
|
||||
| Key | Value |
|
||||
| --- | --- |
|
||||
| ID | RC-019 |
|
||||
| CrossReference | [UCD-001], [QC-UCD-001] |
|
||||
|
||||
## Version History
|
||||
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 2026-10-10 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Initial version | pending |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Artifact Under Review
|
||||
|
||||
- Instance reviewed: [UCD-001]
|
||||
- Checklist used: [QC-UCD-001]
|
||||
|
||||
## Checklist Results
|
||||
|
||||
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 1 | Actors are defined with correct UML stereotypes (e.g. `<<System>>`, `<<Actor>>`) | Pass | DevOps Professional and Platform Operator are `<<Actor>>`; Gitea Instance and GitHub are `<<System>>`. |
|
||||
| 2 | System boundary is clearly drawn and labeled | Pass | Boundary "Reusable Workflow Collection". |
|
||||
| 3 | Include/extend relationships are used correctly per UML 2.5.1, not as generic "uses" arrows | Pass | One include and one extend, each with a justification in the Relationships table; the extend applies only on failure. |
|
||||
| 4 | Every actor participates in at least one use case (no orphan actors) | Pass | All four actors appear in the Actor Table with goals. |
|
||||
| 5 | Diagram is traceable to a documented stakeholder need | Pass | S05, S03 and S04 in the Actor Table; SA-001 and BC-001 cited. |
|
||||
| 6 | Use case names are verb phrases describing actor goals, not internal system operations | Pass | Four goal names, none a system operation. |
|
||||
| 7 | Diagram is free of implementation detail (e.g. UI widgets, database tables) | Pass | No tool, file or UI detail. |
|
||||
| 8 | Actor and use case naming is consistent with corresponding Use Case and User Story documents | Pass | Checked mechanically: all four titles and both story roles match. |
|
||||
|
||||
## Overall Verdict
|
||||
|
||||
Go - all eight criteria pass. S01 gave the Go in chat on 2026-10-10, standing in for the other reviewers as ADR-0002 records; there is no independent reader.
|
||||
|
||||
## Action Items
|
||||
|
||||
| Action | Owner | Due |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| None | - | - |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
[UCD-001]: ../../use-case-diagram.md
|
||||
[QC-UCD-001]: ../../../framework/qc/qc-use-case-diagram.md
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user