Files
SQA-QC-Checklists/qc-domain-model.md
T

3.0 KiB

Quality Criteria: Domain Model

Metadata

Key Value
ID QC-DM-001
CrossReference QC-UC-001, QC-UCD-001, QC-SSD-001
DomainLanguages IT Professional English

Version History

Date Status Author Reviewer Change Commit
2026-10-01 Accepted Jens Tirsvad Nielsen S07 First public release (1.0.0) —

Purpose

The Domain Model captures the essential business vocabulary and concept relationships of the problem space, independent of any implementation. Its quality determines whether downstream design artifacts (SSDs, operation contracts, DCDs) are built on an accurate, shared understanding of the business.

Quality Criteria Checklist

Level: Mandatory criteria are the baseline every instance must meet; Optional criteria are advanced and may be deferred.

# Criterion Level ISO/IEC 25010 Characteristic(s) Notes
1 Uses ubiquitous/business language throughout; no technical or implementation jargon (e.g. no "table", "class", "pointer") Mandatory Maintainability, Usability Domain concepts must be recognizable to business stakeholders
2 Multiplicities on associations are correct and complete (e.g. 1..*, 0..1) Mandatory Functional Suitability Missing or vague multiplicities are a common defect
3 No operation/method signatures shown — attributes and associations only Mandatory Maintainability Domain Model is conceptual, not a design class diagram
4 Associations are named with an unambiguous reading direction Optional Usability, Maintainability e.g. "Order — placed by — Customer"
5 Generalization/specialization used correctly, reflecting true "is-a" relationships, not misused for code reuse Optional Functional Suitability, Maintainability Larman warns against inheritance abuse for implementation convenience
6 Every concept traces to a noun phrase found in the use cases or glossary Mandatory Functional Suitability Prevents invented concepts with no requirement source
7 Attributes are simple domain data (no foreign-key-like references or object pointers modeled as attributes) Mandatory Maintainability Relationships should be modeled as associations, not attribute references

Common Defects

  • Modeling database tables or classes instead of business concepts
  • Including operations/methods on domain concepts
  • Missing or incorrect multiplicities on key associations
  • Unnamed or ambiguously-directioned associations
  • Overuse of generalization hierarchies for convenience rather than genuine taxonomy

Traceability Rule

  • Backward: Must trace to concepts and terminology introduced in the Use Case checklist (QC-UC-001) (and Use Case Diagram checklist QC-UCD-001/glossary)
  • Forward: Feeds into the System Sequence Diagram checklist (QC-SSD-001), which references domain concepts as message parameters and return types