RepoFoundry/docs/sqa/reviews/rc-004-dm-001.md

SQA Review Record: DM-001

Metadata

Key	Value
ID	RC-004
CrossReference	DM-001, QC-DM-001

Version History

Date	Status	Author	Reviewer	Change	Commit
2026-10-05	Proposed	Jens Tirsvad Nielsen	S02	Initial version	02875ae

---

Artifact Under Review

• Instance reviewed: DM-001
• Checklist used: QC-DM-001
• Review date: 2026-10-05

Checklist Results

#	Criterion	Status	Evidence/Notes
1	Uses ubiquitous/business language throughout; no technical or implementation jargon (e.g. no "table", "class", "pointer")	Pass	Business terms; API address is the only technical word and is the data the Maintainer configures.
2	Multiplicities on associations are correct and complete (e.g. 1..*, 0..1)	Pass	All 21 associations have both multiplicities, including the optional GitHub paths.
3	No operation/method signatures shown — attributes and associations only	Pass	Attributes and associations only.
4	Associations are named with an unambiguous reading direction	Pass	Each association has a reading direction.
5	Generalization/specialization used correctly, reflecting true "is-a" relationships, not misused for code reuse	Pass	Only Repository specializes into Gitea Repository and GitHub Repository, justified as is-a.
6	Every concept traces to a noun phrase found in the use cases or glossary	Pass	The concept table traces every concept to a UC-001 step or precondition.
7	Attributes are simple domain data (no foreign-key-like references or object pointers modeled as attributes)	Pass	Attributes are simple data; links are associations.

Overall Verdict

Go — All mandatory criteria pass. Project DM checked: see RC-005. Author and reviewer are the same person for now (S01 and S02 are both held by the Maintainer), so the framework's independence rule is not met; re-review when a second person takes S02.

Action Items

Action	Owner	Due
None	-	-

---