Files

T

TirsvadandClaude Sonnet 5.5 2a6bb8e8af Plan MIL-004: project details preset in config.env

Add objective 8 to the Business Case, US-001.04, extensions 3a and 3b of
UC-001 and the matching SSD, OC, SD, DM-001 and DM-002 notes. Add the phase
to the Project Plan and the milestone MIL-004 with eight Go/No-Go criteria
and five tasks (issues #27 to #31). Review recorded in RC-018.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-10-05 21:44:10 +08:00

4.2 KiB

Raw Blame History

SQA Review Record: MIL-004 and the planning change it causes

Metadata

Key	Value
ID	RC-018
CrossReference	MIL-004, QC-MIL-001, US-001, UC-001

Version History

Date	Status	Author	Reviewer	Change	Commit
2026-10-05	Proposed	Jens Tirsvad Nielsen	S02	Initial version	pending

Artifact Under Review

Instance reviewed: MIL-004, and the changes it causes in BC-001, US-001, UC-001, SSD-001, OC-001, SD-001, DM-001, DM-002 and PP-001.
Checklist used: QC-MIL-001 for MIL-004. The other artifacts were changed, not created; their change is checked below for consistency with the checklists of their types (user story, use case, SSD, operation contract, sequence diagram, domain model) and with the PP reference.
Review date: 2026-10-05

Checklist Results (MIL-004, QC-MIL-001)

#	Criterion	Status	Evidence/Notes
1	A concrete deliverable is defined for every gate	Pass	The script reads eight optional keys, skips their prompts and marks the source; the example config and the README document the keys; tests cover each key.
2	Explicit Go/No-Go criteria are stated for each gate	Pass	Eight criteria, each with an objective Go and No-Go, including all acceptance criteria of US-001.04.
3	Dependencies on other milestones are explicitly mapped	Pass	Depends on [MIL-003], with the reason.
4	Each milestone is traceable to a Business Case objective or KPI	Pass	Maps to objective 8 and success criterion 8 of BC-001, and to US-001.04.
5	Milestone owner and approving reviewer are identified	Pass	Owner S01, approving reviewer S02.
6	Milestone has a defined target date consistent with project constraints	Pass	2026-11-20 matches PP-001; the Business Case sets no duration, so nothing conflicts. The date is a proposal and is accepted here.

Change checks on the other artifacts

Artifact	Change	Status	Evidence/Notes
BC-001	Objective 8, scope item, success criterion 8	Pass	The criterion is measurable (tests with each key set, absent, empty and invalid).
US-001	US-001.04 with four acceptance criteria	Pass	Given/when/then; traces to UC-001 step 3 and MIL-004; size and INVEST exception recorded.
UC-001	Precondition, step 3 note, extensions 3a and 3b, business rule	Pass	Extensions name the failure (invalid key) and the outcome (stop before any request, no fallback to asking).
SSD-001	Parameters of `provideProjectDetails` may come from `config.env`	Pass	The message itself is unchanged, so the diagram is unchanged.
OC-001	Preset details are part of the Configuration	Pass	Postcondition and rule added; no new operation.
SD-001	Note that `ConfigLoader` reads and validates the preset details	Pass	The second sequence is unchanged because the arguments are the same whether asked or preset.
DM-001, DM-002	`Configuration` may hold preset project details	Pass	Both models changed in the same way and the project model stays consistent with the use-case model, as the project rule requires. Dictionary unchanged: no new term.
PP-001	Phase MIL-004, dependency chain and timeline	Pass	Dates agree with MIL-004; scope table and Gantt updated.

Overall Verdict

Go — MIL-004 passes every mandatory criterion and the changes to the other artifacts are consistent with each other and with the Business Case. Author and reviewer are the same person for now (S01 and S02 are both held by the Maintainer), so the framework independence rule is not met; re-review when a second person takes S02.

Action Items

Action	Owner	Due
None	-	-

4.2 KiB Raw Blame History