Files
RepoFoundry/docs/sqa/reviews/rc-024-ssd-002.md
T
Tirsvad 1cd27f77ed Plan MIL-007 and UC-002; AGPL-3.0 default only for a public GitHub project
- MIL-006: the AGPL-3.0 default needs GitHub and a public project
- MIL-007: fetch the framework's own submodules (qc); start through a command link; README usage
- UC-002 with SSD, DM, OC, SD and DCD; US-001.07 and US-002
- Reconcile the project DM, DCD, dictionary, use case diagram and traceability matrix
- Review records RC-022 to RC-028
2026-10-07 12:30:58 +08:00

2.3 KiB

SQA Review Record: SSD-002 Start the script as a global command

Metadata

Key Value
ID RC-024
CrossReference SSD-002, QC-SSD-001, UC-002, DM-003

Version History

Date Status Author Reviewer Change Commit
2026-10-07 Proposed Jens Tirsvad Nielsen S02 Initial version pending

Artifact Under Review

Checklist Results (QC-SSD-001)

# Criterion Status Evidence/Notes
1 Input/output messages match the corresponding Use Case's main success scenario step-for-step Pass startFromWorkingFolder covers steps 3 to 5 and provideProjectDetails steps 5 and 6; steps 1 and 2 are the Maintainer's own and the diagram says so.
2 Actor and System are treated strictly as black boxes (system shown as :System) Pass Only Maintainer and :System appear.
3 Object creation/destruction of the System instance handled explicitly where relevant N-A The system is one script run.
4 Return values are shown for operations that produce one, using dashed return arrows Pass Dashed returns for the prompts and the summary.
5 Alternate/exceptional flows are represented separately (or explicitly out of scope noted) Pass Failure flows are named as out of scope (extensions 1a, 3a, 4a, 4b). Added during this review: the first draft did not say so.
6 Message names are verb phrases consistent with the use case's system responsibilities Pass Both messages are verb phrases.
7 Diagram references the specific Use Case (name and ID) it depicts Pass Names UC-002 in Source Use Case.

Overall Verdict

Go — SSD-002 meets every mandatory criterion after the fix recorded under criterion 5. Drafted by Claude Code for S02 against the checklist; the author and reviewer are the same person for now (as in the earlier records). The verdict takes effect, and the Version History rows of the reviewed documents change to Accepted, only when S02 confirms it.

Action Items

Action Owner Due
None - -