TirsvadandClaude Sonnet 5.5
02875aee5f
Add the Use Case Diagram, Domain Model (use case and project), Dictionary, Operation Contract, Sequence Diagram, review records RC-001 to RC-015 and the Traceability Matrix. Split US-001 into one story per milestone, make GitHub optional (AGPL license applied when chosen), and accept BC-001, SA-001, PP-001, UCD-001, US-001, UC-001, SSD-001, DM-001, DM-002, OC-001, SD-001, DICT-001 and MIL-001 to MIL-003 after review. Refs: no issues synced yet (sync-project.sh dry run only) Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2.0 KiB
2.0 KiB
SQA Review Record: UCD-001
Metadata
| Key | Value |
|---|---|
| ID | RC-009 |
| CrossReference | UCD-001, QC-UCD-001 |
Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-05 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S02 | Initial version | pending |
Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: UCD-001
- Checklist used: QC-UCD-001
- Review date: 2026-10-05
Checklist Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Actors are defined with correct UML stereotypes (e.g. <<System>>, <<Actor>>) |
Pass | Actor <<Actor>>, system boundary <<System>>. |
| 2 | System boundary is clearly drawn and labeled | Pass | The boundary is drawn and labelled RepoFoundry. |
| 3 | Include/extend relationships are used correctly per UML 2.5.1, not as generic "uses" arrows | N-A | No include or extend is used; the Relationships section says why. |
| 4 | Every actor participates in at least one use case (no orphan actors) | Pass | The only actor, Maintainer, takes part in Create a new project. |
| 5 | Diagram is traceable to a documented stakeholder need | Pass | The Maintainer is S01 and S02 in SA-001. |
| 6 | Use case names are verb phrases describing actor goals, not internal system operations | Pass | Create a new project is a verb phrase and a goal. |
| 7 | Diagram is free of implementation detail (e.g. UI widgets, database tables) | Pass | No tools, screens or tables. |
| 8 | Actor and use case naming is consistent with corresponding Use Case and User Story documents | Pass | Names match US-001 and UC-001. |
Overall Verdict
Go — All mandatory criteria pass. Author and reviewer are the same person for now (S01 and S02 are both held by the Maintainer), so the framework independence rule is not met; re-review when a second person takes S02.
Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
|---|---|---|
| None | - | - |