RepoFoundry/docs/sqa/reviews/rc-001-user-story.md

SQA Review Record: US-001

Metadata

Key	Value
ID	RC-001
CrossReference	US-001, QC-US-001

Version History

Date	Status	Author	Reviewer	Change	Commit
2026-10-05	Proposed	Jens Tirsvad Nielsen	S02	Initial version; re-reviewed after UCD-001 and the split into three stories	02875ae

---

Artifact Under Review

• Instance reviewed: US-001
• Checklist used: QC-US-001
• Review date: 2026-10-05

Checklist Results

#	Criterion	Status	Evidence/Notes
1	Follows INVEST criteria (Independent, Negotiable, Valuable, Estimable, Small, Testable)	Pass	INVEST check recorded; the only exception (Independent, on US-001.02 and US-001.03) is stated and follows the milestone order.
2	Written in "As a / I want / So that" form	Pass	All three statements follow As a / I want / So that.
3	Clear, testable acceptance criteria are included	Pass	Three Given/When/Then criteria per story.
4	Traceable to a use case or epic	Pass	Each story traces to UC-001 steps and one milestone.
5	Story is sized to fit within a single iteration	Pass	Re-checked: the epic was split into three stories, one per milestone, each fitting one two-week phase.
6	Story statement avoids technical implementation detail	Pass	Domain terms only (repository, mirror, framework); no tools or commands.
7	Role named in the story matches an actor defined in the Use Case Diagram	Pass	The role Maintainer matches the actor in UCD-001 (re-checked after UCD-001 was created).

Overall Verdict

Go — All mandatory criteria pass and the optional criterion 5 now passes after the split. Author and reviewer are the same person for now (S01 and S02 are both held by the Maintainer), so the framework's independence rule is not met; re-review when a second person takes S02.

Action Items

Action	Owner	Due
Create a Use Case Diagram (UCD-001) and re-check criterion 7	S01	Done 2026-10-05
Split US-001.01 into per-phase stories	S01	Done 2026-10-05

---