# SQA Review Record: DCD-003 Start the script as a global command, and DCD-002

## Metadata
| Key | Value |
| --- | --- |
| ID | RC-028 |
| CrossReference | [DCD-003], [QC-DCD-001], [DCD-002], [DCD-001], [SD-002] |

## Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2026-10-07 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S02 | Initial version | [1cd27f7] |

---

## Artifact Under Review

- Instance reviewed: [DCD-003], and the changes it causes in [DCD-002].
- Checklist used: [QC-DCD-001].
- Review date: 2026-10-07

## Checklist Results (QC-DCD-001)

| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | SOLID principles applied; no god classes with excessive responsibilities | Pass | Three small classes with one responsibility each; `Launcher` has no data and no logic beyond finding folders. |
| 2 | Visibility markers correct and consistent (`+` public, `-` private, `#` protected) | Pass | `+` for operations, `-` for attributes. |
| 3 | Relationships correctly distinguished: Association vs Aggregation vs Composition vs Dependency | Pass | Composition `Run` to `Checkout` and `WorkingFolder`; dependencies for creation; one association `Launcher` to `ProjectCreator`. |
| 4 | Multiplicities and navigability specified on all associations | Pass | The `Launcher` to `ProjectCreator` association had no multiplicity in the first draft; `"1" --> "1"` was added in [DCD-003] and [DCD-002] during this review. |
| 5 | Applied design patterns are annotated explicitly (e.g. Singleton, Factory, Strategy) | Pass | Controller and Information Expert are annotated. |
| 6 | Method signatures are traceable to Operation Contracts and/or design Sequence Diagrams | Pass | Method Traceability maps every method to [OC-002] or [SD-002]. |
| 7 | Class names and structure remain consistent with the Domain Model concepts they refine | Pass | Launcher refines Command Link, Checkout and Working Folder keep their names; the table says why Command Link has no class of its own. |
| 8 | No circular dependencies between classes/packages unless explicitly justified | Pass | `Launcher` depends on the others and none depends on it. |

## Change checks on the other artifacts

| Artifact | Change | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [DCD-002] | `Launcher`, `Checkout`, `WorkingFolder`; `ProjectCreator.startProjectCreation` takes the checkout, the working folder and the two paths | Pass with a note | The signature differs from [DCD-001], [OC-001] and [SD-001], which show `startProjectCreation()` with no parameters. The scoped views of [UC-001] were not changed; [DCD-002] is the consolidated truth and records the new signature and its source in Method Traceability. |

## Overall Verdict

Go-with-conditions — [DCD-003] meets every mandatory criterion, but the consolidated [DCD-002] and the scoped views of [UC-001] disagree on the signature of `startProjectCreation`. The status stays `Proposed` until the action item is closed. Drafted by Claude Code for S02 against the checklist; the author and reviewer are the same person for now (as in the earlier records). The verdict takes effect, and the Version History rows of the reviewed documents change to `Accepted`, only when S02 confirms it.

## Action Items

| Action | Owner | Due |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Decide whether [OC-001], [SD-001] and [DCD-001] get the new `startProjectCreation` parameters too, or are kept as the scoped view of [UC-001] with a note that [DCD-002] supersedes the signature | S01 | Before [MIL-007] starts |

---

[DCD-003]: ../../uc-002/dcd.md
[DCD-002]: ../../dcd.md
[DCD-001]: ../../uc-001/dcd.md
[OC-001]: ../../uc-001/oc.md
[SD-001]: ../../uc-001/sd.md
[SD-002]: ../../uc-002/sd.md
[UC-001]: ../../uc-001/uc.md
[MIL-007]: ../../milestones/mil-007-framework-checklists.md
[QC-DCD-001]: ../../../framework/qc/qc-dcd.md
[OC-002]: ../../uc-002/oc.md
[1cd27f7]: https://git.tirsystem.com/TirSystem-BashScript/repo_foundry/commit/1cd27f77ed844773a969210a11de0d8bb98ac98f