- PROJECT_LICENSE (a Gitea license key, or none) is read, checked and never asked
- Without it AGPL-3.0 applies only when GitHub is chosen and the project is public
- The license is applied on Gitea with or without GitHub, and checked against the server first
- Plan and summary name the license and where it came from
- MIL-006 accepted; README and config.env.example document the key
- Tests: new test-license.sh; existing tests use a public project where they expect AGPL-3.0
Task: MIL-006#1
Task: MIL-006#2
Task: MIL-006#3
Task: MIL-006#4
Refs #44
Refs #45
Refs #46
Refs #50
- MIL-006: the AGPL-3.0 default needs GitHub and a public project
- MIL-007: fetch the framework's own submodules (qc); start through a command link; README usage
- UC-002 with SSD, DM, OC, SD and DCD; US-001.07 and US-002
- Reconcile the project DM, DCD, dictionary, use case diagram and traceability matrix
- Review records RC-022 to RC-028
Add objective 10 to the Business Case, US-001.06 and the use case, SSD, OC,
SD, DM-001, DM-002, dictionary, DCD-001 and DCD-002 changes: a license set
in config.env (PROJECT_LICENSE, a Gitea license key or none) applies with or
without GitHub; when absent AGPL-3.0 applies only when GitHub is chosen. It
is never asked, and a license the server does not offer stops the run
before anything is created.
Add milestone MIL-006 (8 Go/No-Go criteria, 4 tasks) and its phase in the
Project Plan. All new rows are Proposed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Tirsvad
