- PROJECT_LICENSE (a Gitea license key, or none) is read, checked and never asked
- Without it AGPL-3.0 applies only when GitHub is chosen and the project is public
- The license is applied on Gitea with or without GitHub, and checked against the server first
- Plan and summary name the license and where it came from
- MIL-006 accepted; README and config.env.example document the key
- Tests: new test-license.sh; existing tests use a public project where they expect AGPL-3.0
Task: MIL-006#1
Task: MIL-006#2
Task: MIL-006#3
Task: MIL-006#4
Refs #44
Refs #45
Refs #46
Refs #50
Dry run by default: the script reads from both hosts (tokens, owners,
names, license, SSH) and prints a plan; --apply creates the repositories
and the Gitea -> GitHub push mirror after a final yes. Choosing GitHub
applies the AGPL-3.0 license to the Gitea repository. A failed step is
reported with what exists and how to continue; nothing is ever deleted.
create-project.sh is now the entry point; the work lives in src/lib/, one
responsibility per file. .gitignore gets !src/lib (the Python template
ignores any lib/ folder). Tests grow to 599 checks, with a stub curl and
ssh, and guards for the file structure.
Task: MIL-002#1
Task: MIL-002#2
Task: MIL-002#3
Task: MIL-002#4
Task: MIL-002#5
Task: MIL-002#6
Refs #9
Refs #10
Refs #11
Refs #12
Refs #13
Refs #14
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Tirsvad
