Accept planning baseline and UC-001 artifacts
Add the Use Case Diagram, Domain Model (use case and project), Dictionary, Operation Contract, Sequence Diagram, review records RC-001 to RC-015 and the Traceability Matrix. Split US-001 into one story per milestone, make GitHub optional (AGPL license applied when chosen), and accept BC-001, SA-001, PP-001, UCD-001, US-001, UC-001, SSD-001, DM-001, DM-002, OC-001, SD-001, DICT-001 and MIL-001 to MIL-003 after review. Refs: no issues synced yet (sync-project.sh dry run only) Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
|
||||
# SQA Review Record: OC-001
|
||||
|
||||
## Metadata
|
||||
| Key | Value |
|
||||
| --- | --- |
|
||||
| ID | RC-006 |
|
||||
| CrossReference | [OC-001], [QC-OC-001] |
|
||||
|
||||
## Version History
|
||||
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 2026-10-05 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S02 | Initial version | pending |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Artifact Under Review
|
||||
|
||||
- Instance reviewed: [OC-001]
|
||||
- Checklist used: [QC-OC-001]
|
||||
- Review date: 2026-10-05
|
||||
|
||||
## Checklist Results
|
||||
|
||||
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 1 | Method signature is complete: operation name, parameter types, and return type | Pass | Both signatures give name, parameter types and return type. |
|
||||
| 2 | Preconditions explicitly list required state before execution | Pass | Preconditions stated; the first operation has none, stated explicitly. |
|
||||
| 3 | Postconditions explicitly describe resulting state using Larman's "instance created/associated/attribute modified" style | Pass | Postconditions P1 to P4 and P1 to P13 describe instances created, associated or set. |
|
||||
| 4 | Exceptions and error conditions are documented, including the triggering precondition failure | Pass | Exceptions list the failing precondition and the outcome. |
|
||||
| 5 | Operation is explicitly traceable to a single SSD message | Pass | One contract per SSD message. |
|
||||
| 6 | Contract avoids specifying implementation/algorithmic details (declarative, not procedural) | Pass | Declarative state changes; no algorithm. |
|
||||
| 7 | Cross-references the Domain Model classes/associations affected by pre/postconditions | Pass | Uses the IT terms of DICT-001 for the concepts of DM-001. |
|
||||
|
||||
## Overall Verdict
|
||||
|
||||
Go — All mandatory criteria pass. Author and reviewer are the same person for now (S01 and S02 are both held by the Maintainer), so the framework's independence rule is not met; re-review when a second person takes S02.
|
||||
|
||||
## Action Items
|
||||
|
||||
| Action | Owner | Due |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| None | - | - |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
[OC-001]: ../../uc-001/oc.md
|
||||
[QC-OC-001]: ../../../framework/qc/qc-operation-contract.md
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user