Accept planning baseline and UC-001 artifacts
Add the Use Case Diagram, Domain Model (use case and project), Dictionary, Operation Contract, Sequence Diagram, review records RC-001 to RC-015 and the Traceability Matrix. Split US-001 into one story per milestone, make GitHub optional (AGPL license applied when chosen), and accept BC-001, SA-001, PP-001, UCD-001, US-001, UC-001, SSD-001, DM-001, DM-002, OC-001, SD-001, DICT-001 and MIL-001 to MIL-003 after review. Refs: no issues synced yet (sync-project.sh dry run only) Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
|
||||
# SQA Review Record: DM-001
|
||||
|
||||
## Metadata
|
||||
| Key | Value |
|
||||
| --- | --- |
|
||||
| ID | RC-004 |
|
||||
| CrossReference | [DM-001], [QC-DM-001] |
|
||||
|
||||
## Version History
|
||||
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 2026-10-05 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S02 | Initial version | pending |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Artifact Under Review
|
||||
|
||||
- Instance reviewed: [DM-001]
|
||||
- Checklist used: [QC-DM-001]
|
||||
- Review date: 2026-10-05
|
||||
|
||||
## Checklist Results
|
||||
|
||||
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 1 | Uses ubiquitous/business language throughout; no technical or implementation jargon (e.g. no "table", "class", "pointer") | Pass | Business terms; `API address` is the only technical word and is the data the Maintainer configures. |
|
||||
| 2 | Multiplicities on associations are correct and complete (e.g. `1..*`, `0..1`) | Pass | All 21 associations have both multiplicities, including the optional GitHub paths. |
|
||||
| 3 | No operation/method signatures shown — attributes and associations only | Pass | Attributes and associations only. |
|
||||
| 4 | Associations are named with an unambiguous reading direction | Pass | Each association has a reading direction. |
|
||||
| 5 | Generalization/specialization used correctly, reflecting true "is-a" relationships, not misused for code reuse | Pass | Only Repository specializes into Gitea Repository and GitHub Repository, justified as is-a. |
|
||||
| 6 | Every concept traces to a noun phrase found in the use cases or glossary | Pass | The concept table traces every concept to a UC-001 step or precondition. |
|
||||
| 7 | Attributes are simple domain data (no foreign-key-like references or object pointers modeled as attributes) | Pass | Attributes are simple data; links are associations. |
|
||||
|
||||
## Overall Verdict
|
||||
|
||||
Go — All mandatory criteria pass. Project DM checked: see RC-005. Author and reviewer are the same person for now (S01 and S02 are both held by the Maintainer), so the framework's independence rule is not met; re-review when a second person takes S02.
|
||||
|
||||
## Action Items
|
||||
|
||||
| Action | Owner | Due |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| None | - | - |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
[DM-001]: ../../uc-001/dm.md
|
||||
[QC-DM-001]: ../../../framework/qc/qc-domain-model.md
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user