Accept planning baseline and UC-001 artifacts

Add the Use Case Diagram, Domain Model (use case and project), Dictionary, Operation Contract, Sequence Diagram, review records RC-001 to RC-015 and the Traceability Matrix. Split US-001 into one story per milestone, make GitHub optional (AGPL license applied when chosen), and accept BC-001, SA-001, PP-001, UCD-001, US-001, UC-001, SSD-001, DM-001, DM-002, OC-001, SD-001, DICT-001 and MIL-001 to MIL-003 after review. Refs: no issues synced yet (sync-project.sh dry run only) Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-05 13:41:36 +08:00
parent fa3beaf1c1
commit 02875aee5f
32 changed files with 1666 additions and 73 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+# SQA Review Record: SSD-001
+
+## Metadata
+| Key | Value |
+| --- | --- |
+| ID | RC-003 |
+| CrossReference | [SSD-001], [QC-SSD-001] |
+
+## Version History
+| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
+| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
+| 2026-10-05 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S02 | Initial version | pending |
+
+---
+
+## Artifact Under Review
+
+- Instance reviewed: [SSD-001]
+- Checklist used: [QC-SSD-001]
+- Review date: 2026-10-05
+
+## Checklist Results
+
+| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
+| --- | --- | --- | --- |
+| 1 | Input/output messages match the corresponding Use Case's main success scenario step-for-step | Pass | Two operations cover the actor-system exchange of steps 1 to 3; steps 4 to 10 are internal to the system and the SSD says so. |
+| 2 | Actor and System are treated strictly as black boxes (system shown as `:System`) | Pass | Only the Maintainer and `:System` appear. |
+| 3 | Object creation/destruction of the System instance handled explicitly where relevant | Pass | Lifecycle Notes describe one run of the system. |
+| 4 | Return values are shown for operations that produce one, using dashed return arrows | Pass | Dashed returns for the prompt set, the checks and the summary. |
+| 5 | Alternate/exceptional flows are represented separately (or explicitly out of scope noted) | Pass | Failure flows are stated as out of scope. |
+| 6 | Message names are verb phrases consistent with the use case's system responsibilities | Pass | startProjectCreation and provideProjectDetails. |
+| 7 | Diagram references the specific Use Case (name and ID) it depicts | Pass | Names UC-001 and the main success scenario. |
+
+## Overall Verdict
+
+Go — All mandatory criteria pass. Author and reviewer are the same person for now (S01 and S02 are both held by the Maintainer), so the framework's independence rule is not met; re-review when a second person takes S02.
+
+## Action Items
+
+| Action | Owner | Due |
+| --- | --- | --- |
+| None | - | - |
+
+---
+
+[SSD-001]: ../../uc-001/ssd.md
+[QC-SSD-001]: ../../../framework/qc/qc-ssd.md